Photo by tumbleweed@yahoo.com |
The sixth and latest National Survey of Public Opinion on Climate Change was conducted in December, 2011 by Christopher Borick of Muhlenberg College and Barry Rabe of the University of Michigan. It was a telephone survey with 887 respondents and a margin of error of +/-3.5%.
The good news is that belief in global
warming seems to be on the rebound. In Fall 2008, 72% of Americans
believed “there is solid evidence that the average temperature on
Earth has been getting warmer.” This number dropped to 52% by
Spring 2010. Since then, it has gradually increased and now stands
at 62%. 26% say “no,” and 12% are “not sure.”
The survey finds the usual effect of
political partisanship. (See table below.) The other three
demographics they looked at—gender, race and education—had no
effect. Yes, that's right, teachers, education has no effect!
Earth Getting Warmer
|
Earth Not Getting Warmer
|
Not Sure
|
|
Democrats |
78%
|
15%
|
7%
|
Republicans |
47%
|
42%
|
11%
|
Independents |
55%
|
30%
|
15%
|
Respondents who thought the Earth is
getting warmer were asked the primary reason for their belief (out of
nine possibilities that were suggested to them). It was a tie. 24%
cited their personal experience of warmer temperatures, and another
24% said it was the presence of extreme or changing weather (floods,
droughts, tornadoes, etc.) that convinced them. Therefore, almost
half the respondents who believe climate change is real base their
belief on the weather. Only 8% chose scientific research as their
main reason for thinking the Earth is getting warmer.
The problem, of course, is that people
are not distinguishing between weather and climate. Weather is far
more variable. What randomness gives, it can also take away. Next
year, when temperatures in the Northeast regress toward the mean—as
they inevitably will—residents may again reduce their belief in
global warming. (The authors point out that more people claim warm
weather as evidence of climate change when their surveys are
conducted in the Fall than in the Spring.) If we have to wait until
a high percentage of Americans are convinced by the weather
that global warming is real, we may fail to take action in time to
save ourselves.
Finally, respondents were asked whether
they thought “the media is (sic) overstating the evidence about
global warming” and whether “scientists are overstating evidence
about global warming for their own interests.” (Italics mine.) Not surprisingly,
people who did not believe in global warming thought they were being
lied to. 90% thought the media were overstating the evidence and 81%
thought the scientists were.
I'm curious about the thinking that
went into the wording of these two questions. Why are scientists
presumed to have “an interest” in the outcome of global warming
while the media are not? I wonder how much people think climate scientists are paid, whether they think scientists' salaries are contingent on finding evidence of global warming, and,
if so, who is paying them this extra money. How does this compare to
the incentive the media have for understating the
evidence—namely, the millions of dollars they make from fossil fuel
advertising?
The article does not report whether respondents attribute climate change to human activity.
However, the authors promise a follow-up article looking at policy
implications of the survey, so we may learn the answer to
that question later.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always welcome.