While wastewater had been presumed to
have caused earthquakes in Arkansas, Oklahoma and Great Britain, the evidence in this case is much stronger. After the first few quakes,
ODNR hired seismologists from Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory to investigate. When seismographs were placed in
the area, the geologists determined that the epicenters of subsequent
quakes were within .8 kilometers of the injection site at the same
depth (3 km), and were caused by slippage along a previously unmapped
fault.
Operations at the well have been
stopped, and ODNR has issued new rules in Ohio. They have banned
injections below 8,000 feet. They will require pressure and volume
monitoring, and automatic shutoff systems. Finally, they will
require electronic tracking of wastewater entering from outside the
state. Presumably, there will be no attempt to
fine D&L Energy, the owner of the well. Nevertheless, a D&L released a statement disputing the findings, claiming that ODNR opted
for “a politically expedient preliminary report that sacrifices
true understanding for haste.”
Defenders of fracking were quick to
point out that wastewater injection is not the same as fracking, the
process by which natural gas is extracted, which also involves
underground injection of fluids at high pressure. They said that
fracking takes less time than injection of wastewater. Is time the
critical variable? Other possibilities would seem to include the
volume of fluids deposited in the ground, the depth of the drilling, and the pressure required to do it.
Although disposal of wastewater is only
one of many public health problems associated with fracking, it is one of the most serious. There are approximately
144,000 gas wells in the U. S. producing 2 billion gallons of
wastewater every day. Wastewater consists not only of fracking fluid,
which contains known carcinogens and toxins, but also material
brought up to the surface from the shale, including radioactive heavy metals.
There are three options for disposing
of wastewater. (1) What they call “recycling” involves diluting
it with fresh water and reusing it for subsequent fracking. However,
eventually toxins accumulate and it can no longer be reused. (2) At
this point, it could be sent to water treatment plants, but most
existing plants are inadequate to treat these toxins. Wastewater
sent to Western Pennsylvania treatment plants produced measurable increases in bromides, which are linked to cancer and birth defects, in the Monongahela River. (3) That leaves
underground injection.
These earthquakes occurred in part
because there was an “unmapped”—that is, unknown—fault in the
area. What percentage of faults are known? That's unknown. (Duh.)
Researchers say the only way to prevent future earthquakes is to do a
seismic survey of the area prior to constructing the wastewater
facility. Such a survey would cost $10 million per well. I'm sure
the industry will be happy to oblige.
Pennsylvania, unlike Ohio, does not
even monitor wastewater disposal facilities, but relies on the
Environmental Protection Agency to handle permits for these
facilities. An EPA spokesman, Jon Capacasa, said this could not have happened on their watch because they require companies seeking
permits “to identify known faults . . within a mile of a
proposed well site.” (Italics mine.) But of course this fault was
unknown. I guess he didn't read the report.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always welcome.