This
ad is part of a larger campaign in which Republican organizations
trot out Obamacare “victims” to tell stories that are almost
always misleading. Journalists eventually debunk these stories, but
many more people hear the lie on television than read the truth in a
newspaper, and even those who are told that the story is false often
refuse to believe it.
Brendan Nyhan has been doing research for several years which shows that
attempts to correct misinformation fail when they oppose people's deeply
entrenched political ideologies. In fact, they can backfire and
produce a boomerang effect—attitude
change in the direction opposite to that intended by the speaker. Dr. Nyhan's latest study, released just
last week, was an attempt to dispel the myth popular among
conservatives that the measles, mumps and rubella vaccination (MMR)
causes autism. Here's some background on the controversy from Aaron Carroll.
In the study, a nationally representative sample of
1759 young parents were randomly assigned to receive one of four pro-vaccine messages or a control message, delivered via the internet. The pro-vaccine messages, all taken from the Center for Disease Control
(CDC) website, were:
- Autism correction—written scientific evidence debunking the vaccination-autism link.
- Disease risks—written descriptions of symptoms and risks associated with measles, mumps and rubella.
- Disease narrative—a dramatic narrative in which a mother tells how her baby almost died from the measles.
- Disease images—photographs of children suffering from symptoms of the three diseases.
The
control group received an article about the costs and benefits of
bird feeding. Nyhan measured the belief that the MMR causes
autism, the belief that the MMR has serious side effects, and whether the
participants intended to have their next child vaccinated, both
before exposure to one of the messages and again about two weeks
later.
The results were disappointing. Compared to the control group, the
autism correction message significantly reduced the belief that
the MMR causes autism. That was the only intended effect. The other
three significant results were all boomerang effects. The disease
narrative increased
the belief that the MMR has serious side effects. The disease images
increased the belief
that the MMR causes autism. And finally, the autism correction
resulted in parents reporting that they would be less
likely to vaccinate future children. This latter effect was
strongest for those parents who initially believed that the vaccine
causes autism.
Ordinarily we should not make too much
of studies that demonstrate no significant change. After all,
the CDC messages could have been ineffective for a variety of reasons
not immediately apparent to a reader of the study. It's also
possible that different messages or combinations of messages might
have worked. However, these were statistically significant backfire
effects, and they should probably be taken seriously. The tendency of beliefs to persist or grow stronger even when the
evidence for them is shown to be false is known as belief perseverance. The widely-accepted explanation for perseverance
effects is self-persuasion. When people hear a message they
disagree with, they counterargue with it. In the process, they
expose themselves to their own counterarguments and persuade
themselves to change their attitudes in the opposite direction from
the message.
In the short run, at least, social scientists
are becoming known in the media for delivering a depressing
message: Factual information is ineffective in changing people's
ideologically-motivated attitudes. So far, we have been unable to propose
effective strategies for breaking through the barriers imposed by
politically-inspired misinformation.
You may also be interested in reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always welcome.