Photo by www.defenceimages.mod.uk
The bullet works on the same principle as a smart bomb. An optical sensor in the nose of the bullet detects
a laser beam on the target and sends feedback to a control system,
also built into the bullet. The bullet flies straighter than usual because it lacks the spin caused by the uneven surface
which keeps a normal bullet from hitting its target. It has a smooth
surface and fins to prevent it from spinning. According to Sandia, a
typical bullet misses a target one-half mile away by 9.8 yards, while
this bullet only misses by 8 inches.
The key to near perfect accuracy is
“painting” the target with a laser beam. I presume the laser is
built into the scope of the rifle. The shooter will only have to
keep the laser on the target until the bullet arrives. However, this
limits the range of the weapon. An alternative would be a two-person
operation, with one person spotlighting the target with a laser while
the other fires the weapon. In theory, this would allow the shooter
to hit the target from an even greater distance and may not require a direct line of sight to the target.
Doesn't this begin to sound like a
political assassin's wet dream?
Stanley Milgram and other social psychologists who have found that anything that decreases salience of a helpless victim increases willingness to harm that victim. The physical distance between an aggressor and his target is one factor determining salience. It's much easier to kill someone from a distance of half a mile than from three feet, where you have to see, hear and smell his death.
Here's a cheerful video from a fellow
who doesn't see any downside to this weapon:
Sandia's press release says, “Potential
customers for the bullet include the military, law enforcement and
recreational shooters.” (That's funny. The reporter on the video
said that too. I guess plagiarizing from a corporate press release
is much easier than writing your own copy. And they don't seem to
mind at all!) The only impediment would seem to be
the cost. Of course, cost is no problem for the U. S. military,
but every police force in the country will want to have them as well.
Not to worry. I'm sure most communities will be willing to lay off
a public school teacher or two in order to accomodate them. As
these weapons become more common, how long will it be before they
start to disappear from the supply room?
Certainly, many hunters will want to have one in order to add a few extra inches to their manhood. But it seems to me that self-guided bullets are the hunter's equivalent of “fishing” by throwing a stick of dynamite into a pond and picking up the dead fish as they float to the surface. They're just not very sporting.
What's to keep every moron in the
country from owning one of these toys? The National Rifle
Association will surely insist that anyone who can legally buy a gun
can has a right to have one that fires self-guided bullets. After
all, they are needed in order to protect ourselves from our
neighbors, who we suspect are also planning to purchase one of these
weapons.
Price may turn out not be a problem. Sandia
says these weapons “can be developed inexpensively and rapidly.” You and I have already paid for the R&D. There are big
bucks to be made by pricing them to sell. Public subsidies followed
by private profits. This is the corporate welfare state as it's
intended to function.
If one of these rifles and six bullets winds
up costing less than a laptop computer, I'm going to be worried.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are always welcome.